<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>DailyApps - Latest Comments in Google Updates Pagerank, Shocks Many Leading Publishers</title><link>http://dailyapps.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://dailyapps.disqus.com/google_updates_pagerank_shocks_many_leading_publishers/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 03:05:36 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Google Updates Pagerank, Shocks Many Leading Publishers</title><link>http://dailyapps.net/2007/10/google-updates-pagerank-shocks-many-leading-publishers/#comment-191924784</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;e the trouble. &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.asicsshoesking.org/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.asicsshoesking.org/"&gt;http://www.asicsshoesking.org/&lt;/a&gt; That is probably the reason for loss of PR for engadget, SEJ etc...they link to network blogs&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">asics shoes</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 03:05:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Updates Pagerank, Shocks Many Leading Publishers</title><link>http://dailyapps.net/2007/10/google-updates-pagerank-shocks-many-leading-publishers/#comment-191755726</link><description>&lt;p&gt;is this the reason why the popular tenga sex toy seller &lt;a href="http://tengatango.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="tengatango.com"&gt;tengatango.com&lt;/a&gt; drops from page 1 of google to page 2? &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tuckcts</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 19:29:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Updates Pagerank, Shocks Many Leading Publishers</title><link>http://dailyapps.net/2007/10/google-updates-pagerank-shocks-many-leading-publishers/#comment-13335003</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just unistall the big G toolbar, maybe that will send a message, talk about text link adds, if you pay enough to the big G, they will reward you for buying those links, for certain.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Janie</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 00:40:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Updates Pagerank, Shocks Many Leading Publishers</title><link>http://dailyapps.net/2007/10/google-updates-pagerank-shocks-many-leading-publishers/#comment-13335002</link><description>&lt;p&gt;@Sumesh, I have to agree with you on that one. Google is not going to dictate terms atleast here on dailyApps. I have my own plans on how I would like to go ahead. So my best wishes to Google..&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Karthik Kastury</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 09:26:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Updates Pagerank, Shocks Many Leading Publishers</title><link>http://dailyapps.net/2007/10/google-updates-pagerank-shocks-many-leading-publishers/#comment-13335001</link><description>&lt;p&gt;One more thing here - its not just TLA, but generally dofollow links to unrelated sites/paid links to related sites that cause the trouble. That is probably the reason for loss of PR for engadget, SEJ etc...they link to network blogs.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sumesh</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 08:56:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Updates Pagerank, Shocks Many Leading Publishers</title><link>http://dailyapps.net/2007/10/google-updates-pagerank-shocks-many-leading-publishers/#comment-13335000</link><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Pagerank of the homepage of dailyApps continues to remain 0, so no decrease for me so far&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Haha, same here - we just can't lose PR from here. Hehe...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;On a serious note, I do believe that more bloggers will come out openly against PR, much like J.Chow. After all, they won't want Google to dictate terms of selling links. We may also see more nofollow links being included as sponsorship - ie, links for exposure rather than PR.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sumesh</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 08:48:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Updates Pagerank, Shocks Many Leading Publishers</title><link>http://dailyapps.net/2007/10/google-updates-pagerank-shocks-many-leading-publishers/#comment-13334999</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why should they reduce the scale from 10 to 5...the wider it is the more better for google,isn't it? otherwise pagerank distinctions between sites won't be that great and google's pagerank itself wouldn't get so much of hype that we see today...google would better prefer the hype that PR is currently generating...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Innovations &amp;amp; interesting </dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 02:33:42 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>